• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC: Assessment Under Section 153C Based on Incriminating Papers

Under Section 153C the Madras High Court rules that the examination is on the grounds of related documents or evidence found through the search.

Assessment Under Section 153C

The taxpayer is the owner of S.R.Trust which is the enrolled trust who does charity. Under section 132 a search was done in November 2014 with respect to the managing trustee of the taxpayer which is developed and is controlling the hospital at Madurai.

Following that, the search action was done with the case of one who has been said to be the supplier in the hospital for medical After GST implementation, the medical sector has been hit by several ways. Here, we explained new tax regime impact on important medicine prices. Read More and surgical equipment.

“The Department was of the prima facie view pursuant to the search that the funds were siphoned off through the said, Mr.T.John Rajasekhar allegedly resorting to a huge inflation of expenses through salaries paid to staff members by transfer of funds to the bank accounts of the employees as if salaries were paid to them”.

On the grounds of captured credentials under section 153 of the act, notice is being circulated for the case of the taxpayer’s trust in the assessment years. Under section 143(3) read with Section 153C of the Act for the years the investigation gets finished before consideration.

As unsatisfied by the litigations made through the assessing officer the taxpayer has chosen to appeal to CIT(A) who through the common order has permitted the appeals furnished by the taxpayers. Revenue furnished by the appeal against the order of the authority in which it is ruled that the officer must not think the jurisdiction stated beneath Section 153C of the Act.

Within the absence of any related credentials or evidence throughout the search operation against the taxpayers under section 132 of the Act and for this case the taxpayers under the provisions of Section 153C of the Act shall not be pretended said the two judges T.S. Sivangananam and Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayan while stating the decision of the authority

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software