• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Allows Contestation of Three Missed GST Personal Hearing Notices with 10% ECR Pre-deposit

Madras HC’s Order in Case of Tvl.Jeyaprakash Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-2

When the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) personal hearing notice was not noticed 3 times, the Madras High Court granted a chance to challenge a 10% pre-deposit from the Electronic Cash Register ( ECR ).

The taxpayer, a small-time operator, lost to notice the show cause notices ( ASMT 10 dated 17.10.2022, DRC 01A dated 11.07.2023, and DRC 01 dated 19.08.2023 ) published on the GST common portal.

It was furnished that the taxpayer did not notice the three personal hearing notices dated 26.09.2023, 30.10.2023, and 16.11.2023 and presented the taxpayer may be given one chance to explain the case.

Read Also: Madras HC Orders a 10% Pre-deposit for Reconsideration Due to Consultant’s Failure to Notify GST Return Discrepancies

The respondent, representing the GST department, claimed that the writ petition was limited to time and is to be dismissed based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Assistant Commissioner ( CT ) LTU, Kakinada vs. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited.

They argued that the appellate remedy was indeed limited to time u/s 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017, citing Singh Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur (2008) 3 SCC 70.

The bench of Justice C. Saravanan of the Madras High Court taking into account the submissions opined that the taxpayer might be provided partial relief via quashing the impugned GST order and remitting the matter back to the respondent to pass the new orders as per the taxpayer depositing the 10% disputed tax to the credit of the respondent via its electronic Cash Register.

The court asked that the order be quashed and considered an addendum to the show cause notices (SCN) that preceded the impugned order. It was directed to the taxpayer to file a response within 30 days of the deposit.

For the petitioner Mr.Raja.Karthikeyan has appeared and respondent Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader appeared.

Case TitleTvl.Jeyaprakash Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-2
Case No.:W.P.(MD) No.14052 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.12315 & 12316 of 2024
Date28.06.2024
For petitionerMr.Raja.Karthikeyan
For respondentMr.R.Suresh Kumar
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates