• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Allows TDS Credit to Assessee Blocked by AO Due to PAN Mistake

Kolkata ITAT's Order for Dilip B Desai

The income tax appellate tribunal (ITAT), Pune bench was accepted late of 931 days in furnishing the taxpayer finding out that the delay was because the tax practitioners were busy with the GST compliance. Mr Vasathan Mukundan furnished a petition before CIT(A) with a delay of 931 days.

The taxpayer would be subjected to performing a tax audit u/s 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and get deducted TDS and returns filing on the quarterly grounds without fail.

Moreover, we see that the taxpayer obtained the e-mail communication showing the imposition of Rs 18,934 for the Delay in TDS return filing.

The taxpayer specified that its accounts staff would not be known about the taxation laws, however, the TDS returns were furnished on a regular basis. The mentioned staff members would only be the data entry operators posing no knowledge of taxation laws.

The taxpayer indeed specified that the tax professionals involved in furnishing the ITR, tax audits, and statutory audits specified beneath the income tax and the companies act were busy with their duties and indeed the rules concerning to the GST act.

We learn that the taxpayer would not be intended to furnish the TDS returns belatedly, while the issue arises is that the TDS returns were furnished on a regular grounds with no-fail similar to that, petition file to CIT(A).

A bench of Shri R.S. Syal, Vice President, and Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member sees that it was an accidental error without any malafide intention.

CIT(A) shows to acknowledge the causes elaborated by the taxpayer and accepts the delay. On hearing both the parties to us, we see that the taxpayer can enable to make out enough cause that really prevented him from furnishing a petition within time.

Hence delay of 931 days was accepted and we direct the CIT(A) (NFAC), Delhi to decide the problems asked in the initial petition on the advantages and issue an order as per the law by providing enough opportunity for hearing to the taxpayer, said Tribunal. Shri Kiran Sanmane appeared for the taxpayer.

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software