• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT: Tax Portal Not Imaged Notice & Demand U/S 143(1), No More Addition

ITAT's Jaipur Order for Shri Paras Kuhad

The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) stated that as the intimation under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not show in the tax portal hence there could not be any resulting issues referred to the assessment.

The taxpayer, Mr, Paras Kuhad is a Senior Advocate who practices in the Supreme Court of India and furnished the income return for the related year. The income return which was furnished would get amended u/s 139(5) on the date 30.09.2018 in the mentioned time limit of the law furnished for amending the return.

By showing the total income of Rs 6,19,02,760 the return was amended the amended return furnished via taxpayer treated as cognizance and the same was processed via the council and vide intimation u/s 143(1)(a) and made an addition on the differential income.

The taxpayer stated, the whole proceedings were finished in the pendency of the regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(2)&(3). Moreover, the calculation order on 25.3.2019 has been integrated with the final assessment order on 20.12.2019 in which no addition on the basis of the LTCG was incurred.

Therefore the same would be seen that the notice u/s 143(2) for scrutiny assessment (for the assessment year appeal) was issued in the taxpayer’s name dated 13.08.2018 which date is before the date notice u/s 143(1)(a) provided on the date 26.11.2018 which has culminated in the impugned order.

Permitting the taxpayer’s petition, Shri Sandeep Gosain, JM & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai, AM sees that “Since the very basis being the intimation dated 25.03.2019 is not reflected on the system and the consequent demand or adjustment already merged into the order of the AO passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act. There cannot remain any grievance on account of the intimation dated 25.03.3019. Even the ld. AO has submitted a factual report and submitted that the intimation u/s. 143(1) dated 25.03.2019 is not reflected in the online system and consequent demand thereupon also. Thus, once the intimation which the very cause of the grievance of the assessee is not reflected and existed on records the consequent grievance also not existed and thus the appeal of the assessee becomes infructuous.”

Case TitleShri Paras Kuhad vs The DCIT
CitationM.A.T. No.1595 of 2022 With I.A. No.CAN 1 of 2022
Date26.09.2022
AppellantShri O.P. Agarwal, CA
Shri Maniesh Agarwal, CA
RevenueShri Sanjay Dhariwal, CIT-DR
Jaipur ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software