• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT: Section 80P of Tax Deduction Can’t be Refused If ITR Not Filed within Deadline

Rajkot ITAT's Order for Aliudepur Seva Sahakari Mandli Ltd

The Rajkot bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has ruled that, under Section 80P, the income tax deduction cannot be refused due to failure to file an Income-tax return by the deadline.

The assessee is duly registered with a co-operative society under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act. The assessee’s primary source of revenue comes from the exclusive provision of credit to its members. The assessee has accrued interest revenue from both its investors in other cooperative societies and from its members.

According to section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, the assessee filed its return of income after the deadline and claimed a deduction of Rs. 7,83,615 under section 80P. The centralised processing centre in Bengaluru processed the assessee’s income tax return after receiving notification under section 143(1), denying the assessee’s claim for a deduction under section 80P because the return of income was not submitted by the deadline outlined in section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961.

An appeal was filed by the distressed assessee before the CPC centre. It claimed that there is no provision in section 143(1) (a) to adapt to the returned income by refusing under section 80P. In the Finance Act.2021, there was also a revision in section 143(1) (a) (v). It says that from FY 2022-23, such disallowances are possible under the 143(1) proceedings.

The instructions for the assessee asserted that the Finance Act of 2021’s change to Section 143(1) is not relevant to the current assessment year 2019-2020.

The Assessee cannot be denied the deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act of 1961 because the Assessee did not file the return of income within the due date prescribed under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act under proceedings made under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2019–20, according to the Coram included Account Member Waseem Ahmed and the Judicial Member T.R. Senthil Kumar.

Case TitleAliudepur Seva Sahakari Mandli Ltd. vs The ADIT, (CPC), Bengaluru
CitationITA No. 269/Rjt/2022
ITA No. 276/Rjt/2022
ITA No. 277/Rjt/2022
Date24.02.2023
Assessee RepresentedMs. Devina Patel, A.R
Revenue RepresentedShri B.D. Gupta, Sr.D.R
ITAT RajkotRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software