• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Quashes Addition Due to Mistake in Cross Verifying TDS Details

Kolkata ITAT's Order for M/s. Jai Balaji Industries Limited

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata has ruled that the Assessing Officer is not able to validate the information of the Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) via the related party and deletes addition.

While at the time of the scrutiny assessment of the petitioner, M/s. Jai Balaji Industries Limited, the Assessing Officer ruled that a sum of Rs 11,45,372, alleging, a mismatch in the income obtained via the appellant relying on the details made from 26AS TDS information. The petitioner furnished a petition to the first appellant authority which confirmed the addition and thus the petition was chosen for the ITAT.

The counsel for the petitioner made that the petitioner executes an advance payment of Rs 9,39,708 to Tata Meta links DI Pipes Limited buying scrap materials. The taxpayer claim would have been cancelled via Revenue Authorities on the basis of the precise amount is not discernible via the statement of 26AS, the authority will show the amount (for the prepared bill). Often it is not needed that the advance that the taxpayer furnished must match wholly with the buying incurred via it. The advance can be managed for the additional buying.

The Assessing Officer maintains on creating references to Bank accounts, partial payments, and others, the tribunal found. It is when the assessing officer cross-checks via a related party, Tata Metaliks DI Pipes Limited, that much more excessive litigation along with the wastage of resources can be prevented.

Read Also: ITAT Removes Penalty on Late STF Filing Due to Late Received of Notice

The Coram consists of Mr. Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ), and Mr. Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member during permitting the petition ruled that excluding hiring that cross-validating of information from the related party, the AO carried on to draw the conception of the defects in the information of the taxpayer through the method of the deductive reasoning method. Therefore, the denial is not sustainable.

On the ground of the petitioner and respondent respectively, Mr. Punit Agarwal and Smt. Ranu Biswas appeared.

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software