• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


HC Permits Petitioner for Hearing Who Failed to e-File GST Returns Due to Health Issues

Calcutta HC's Order for M/S. DYM Auto World

In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court mandated that the assessee who failed to submit a GST return owing to mental stress and physical illness be given a chance to be heard.

The petitioner was a payee for his proprietorship firm under M/S. DYM Auto World. On December 31, 2020, he submitted his GST return for the month of June 2020 within the allotted time.

After suffering significant losses in his business, the petitioner was unable to file a GST return within the allotted time frame. As a result, he lost control and even made attempted suicide on December 27, 2020.

He spent the entire month of December and maybe some of January 2021 in the hospital. The petitioner received a notice to show cause to terminate the GST registration because he failed to file a return for a continuous six-month period.

The petitioner said that he was unable to submit the return by the deadline because of his medical condition, mental instability, and loss of business. Additionally, he was unable to respond to the GST show-cause notice.

It was accepted legal doctrine that the reasons form the very foundation of the ruling and that failing to communicate them amounts to denying the other party a fair chance to be heard, which taints the course of justice. According to Justice Bibek Chaudhuri, the petitioner was not given the chance to be heard. The petitioner attempted suicide because he was experiencing extreme mental stress at the time.

Read Also: GST on Medicines and Medical Supplies in India

The Court stated that “the petitioner should be given an opportunity of hearing. But to avail of such opportunity, the petitioner shall first make payment of up-to-date GST with statutory interest and penalty within three weeks from the date.”

Case TitleM/S. DYM Auto World vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise & Ors
Citation2023 TAXSCAN (HC) 247
Appellant byMr Jagriti Mishra, Mr Subrata Pal & Mr Unus Ali
Respondent byMr Ratan Banik
Calcutta High Court

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates