• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi HC Slams GST Authorities for Neglecting Natural Justice Principle, Orders Re-adjudication

Delhi HC’s Order In Case of Dish TV India Ltd. Vs. GST Officer

The Delhi High Court in a case has directed re-adjudication concerning the order passed u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the failure to comply with the natural justice principle.

The applicant Dish TV India Ltd has furnished the writ petition against the demand created u/s 73 of the CGS Tax Act.

The counsel for the applicant before the division bench Rajesh Jain furnished that the applicant had furnished a response on 26.10.2023 and 6.11.2023 but an impugned order on 30.12.2023 does not regard the response that the applicant furnished and is a cryptic order.

Respondent’s counsel furnished that post-filing the SCN (Show Case Notice) no proper response/explanation had been uploaded via assessee. The court noted that no chance was furnished to the applicant to respond or provide the additional documents/information. It was revealed that the order passed u/s 73 of the CGST Act was not sustainable for the reason that the replies dated 26.10.2023 and 6.11.2023 were filed by the detailed response including the supporting documents.

A division bench of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Ravinder Dudeja post examining the points of both the parties asked for the re-adjudication for the order passed u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on account of failure to follow the natural justice principle.

Read Also: Delhi HC Orders Re-adjudication to Address the Taxpayer’s Incapability for Responding GST SCN

For the applicant Mr Vivek Sarin, Mr Dibya Prashant Singh & Mr Satish C. Kaushik, advocates appeared and Mr Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Ms Shaguftha H. Badhwar, Mr Prateek Badhwar & Ms Samridhi Vats, Mr Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr Subham Kumar & Mr Vipul Teotia, for respondents.

Case TitleDish TV India Ltd. Vs. GST Officer
CitationW.P.(C) 5475/2024, CM APPL. 22567/2024 & CM APPL. 22568/2024
Date16.04.2024
For the Petitioner:Mr Vivek Sarin, Mr Dibya Prashant Singh & Mr Satish C. Kaushik
For the Respondents:Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC Shaguftha H. Badhwar, Mr. Prateek Badhwar & Ms. Samridhi Vats
Delhi High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates