• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Calcutta HC: No Pending Payable Taxes, Won’t Get Punished U/S 129 of the GST Act

Calcutta High Court's Order for Mohammad Shamasher

Introduction For CGST– the Calcutta High Court In a significant legal development directed the pivotal judgment for the case of Mohammad Shamasher vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., challenging penalties imposed under Section 129 of the State Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act. This case is about the detention of an escalator machine (JCB) and subsequent penalties for alleged breach.

Detailed Analysis About GST Under Section 129: The petitioner, the sole proprietor of M/s Afika Infrastructure, faced penalties under Section 129 (3) of the State GST Act for the vehicle’s interception without documentation.

The court insights into the intricacies, highlighting that the respondent authority does not have the power to find out the tax amounts under Section 129 proceedings. The court emphasized alternative penalty provisions under Section 122 and highlighted the importance of compliance with Sections 73 and 74 for tax determination.

The applicant contended the machine’s validity of the e-way bill, claiming that no tax was to be levied on its return post-finish of the work. The legal references along with the judgments from Uttarakhand, Allahabad, and the Calcutta High Court, were quoted to support the view that procedural inappropriateness shouldn’t result in disproportionate penalties.

Closure: The High Court considering the e-way bill validity however stressing the absence of the delivery challan set aside the penalties. The judgment shows that the petitioner’s unintentional tax evading makes the 200% penalty disproportionate. The court rendered the adjudicating authority to revalidate the case that is aligned with the discussions, stressing a clear and reasoned decision within 8 weeks.

The same case clarifies the nuances of section 129 penalties as well as a precedent underlining proportionality in penalty levy. From the identical cases, the businesses that are facing issues might draw insights via the same landmark judgment. You should remain updated with the additional lawful analyses and implications in the surging world of GST norms.

Case TitleMohammad Shamasher Vs State of West Bengal & Ors
Case No.WPA 85 of 2024
Date01.02.2024
For the Writ PetitionerMr. Dhiraj Lakhotia, Adv., Ms. Radhika Agarwal, Adv., Ms. Khushi Kundu, Adv.
For the StateMr. Momenur Rahman, Adv., Ms. Rima Sarkar, Adv
Calcutta High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates