• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Allahabad HC Rejects GST Demand Order Due to Missing Oral Hearing Opportunity U/S 75 for Assessee

Allahabad HC's Order In The Case of Jain Medicals V/S State of U.P. and Another

A tax demand order against M/S Jain Medicals has been set aside by the Allahabad High Court quoting the refusal of a chance for an oral hearing as obligated Under Section 75(4) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017.

On 05.12.2023, M/s Jain Medicals filed a writ petition contesting an order issued via the income tax department asking for a demand of Rs 60,383 for the tax duration 2017-18.

The applicant’s counsel Pranjal Shukla, argued that the applicant was refused an obligatory oral hearing. On 02.09.2023 a notice asked for the response of the applicant within 30 days but marked “NA” in the columns for “Date of personal hearing,” “Time of personal hearing,” and “Venue where personal hearing will be held,” therefore preventing any hearing chance.

Also Read:- GST E-Way Bills Not Required: Allahabad HC Throws Out Penalties (Feb 1, 2018 – Mar 31, 2018)

The decision of the coordinate bench has been quoted by the counsel in Bharat Mint & Allied Chemicals vs. Commissioner Commercial Tax & 2 Ors., which affirmed that the Assessing Authority must allow a personal hearing before issuing an adverse order.

The revenue counsel Ankur Agarwal claimed that the applicant was refused the chance of hearing as he already had tick marked the option ‘No’ against the option for personal hearing in the online reply to the show-cause notice. Consequently, the applicant cannot afterwards claim any error in the order.

The bench of Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Anish Kumar Gupta remarked, “An opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person.”

With Bharat Mint & Allied Chemicals, the court concurred, stressing that the assessing authority should be required to furnish a chance of hearing before passing an adverse order, without considering the taxpayer’s appeal.

Read Also:- Easy to Understand 21 Offences, Penalties and Appeals Under GST

The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the case to the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax. A new notice is to be issued before the applicant within 2 weeks.

Case TitleJain Medicals V/S State of U.P. and Another
Citation2024:AHC:106451-DB
Date01.07.2024
Counsel For AppellantPranjal Shukla
Counsel For RespondentC.S.C.
Allahabad High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates