• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


AP HC: Composite GST Assessment Order Covering Multiple Tax Periods Can’t Be Sustained

AP HC's Order in The Case of M/s. G M R A Shaha Iron Steels vs. The Assistant Commissioner State Tax

The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in a ruling, has mentioned that a common or composite GST assessment order that includes more than one tax period cannot be sustained.

The assessment order has been contested by a registered firm, which was passed u/s 74 of the GST Act in a consolidated manner for tax periods including financial years 2020-21 to 2023-24.

The counsel of the taxpayer, G M R A Shaha Iron Steels, has claimed that passing one assessment order for multiple tax periods was not allowable under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act.

They placed reliance on the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s earlier decision in S.J. Constructions v. Assistant Commissioner & Others where it stated that “a single show cause notice or a single composite assessment order cannot be passed in relation to more than one tax period of either a month if the assessment is taken up before the due date for filing of the annual return or for more than one year if the due date for filing of annual return has been reached.”

Important: AP HC: Single SCN and Composite GST Order Cannot Be Given for Multiple Tax Periods

The counsel for the revenue did not specify any objection in the case.

The Division Bench, Justice Ninala Jayasurya and Justice T.C.D. Sekhar quashed the assessment order and allowed the GST authorities to start fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year.

“Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, setting aside the impugned assessment order dated 27.05.2025, leaving it open to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings, for each assessment year separately.”

Read Also: Andhra Pradesh HC Sets Aside Composite GST Assessment Order Covering Multiple Years

The relief was given on the condition that the applicant must deposit 20% of the disputed tax within 6 weeks from the receipt of the order. The amount paid after the assessment order was passed shall be adjusted while computing the 20% deposit.

Case TitleM/s. G M R A Shaha Iron Steels vs. The Assistant Commissioner, State Tax
Case No.WRIT PETITION NO: 22817 OF 2026
For PetitionerP VASU Sekhar
For RespondentGP for Commercial Tax
Andhra Pradesh High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates