• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Orders Fresh GST Assessment: Contractor May Prove Pre-2022 Work to Avoid 18% Tax

Madras HC's Order In Case of V.Janarthanan vs. The State Tax Officer (Ins)-III

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, in a ruling on the applicable GST rate for a works contract completed before the 2022 rate revision, directed the department to reassess the demand based on the evidence submitted.

The petitioner, V. Janarthanan, a contractor, challenged an assessment order issued under Section 74. The department raised a demand claiming that tax was paid at a rate of 12% instead of the required 18%, citing Notification No. 03/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated July 13, 2022.

As per the applicant, the works were finished in 2020 before the amendment in tax rate, and that merely the invoice was been raised belatedly in July 2022 to regularise records. Based on the same, the change of differential tax at 18% was not justified.

As per the state, the applicant has been provided a chance to verify his claim, though unable to provide the supporting documents, thereby explaining the assessment order.

As per the court, the facts have been analysed, citing that the demand for the other defects has fallen, and there is only the dispute over the tax rate.

Read Also: A Complete Guide on Job Work Under GST India

Before the effective date of the notification of the enhanced GST rate from 12 to 18 per cent, whether the Work was finished was the main issue, Justice C. Saravanan cited.

Reconsideration is needed in the case, the court said, it quashes the impugned order insofar as it is pertinent to the higher tax rate. The department must do the assessment again after giving the applicant a chance to file the documentary proof that the works were finished before July 2022.

As per the High Court, if the applicant is not able to provide the proof that is needed, the department can reconfirm the demand.

Recommended: GST: Impact of New Taxation Structure on Works Contract

Towards the penalty levied u/s 74, the court left it open for the applicant to contest the same after a fresh final order is passed.

Case TitleV.Janarthanan vs The State Tax Officer (Ins)-III
Case No.W.P.(C) 5757/2025 & CM APPL. 26284/202W.P.(MD) No. 22406 of 2025

W.M.P.(MD) Nos.17495 & 17496 of 2025
For PetitionerMr. N. Sudalai Muthu
For RespondentMr. R.Suresh Kumar, Additional Government Pleader
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2025

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates