• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Gujarat AAAR Reverses AAR’s Decision, Grants GST Exemption on Govt Consultancy Services

Gujarat GST AAAR's Order for M/s Devendra Kantibhai Patel

The Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) has overturned a prior ruling on Devendra Kantibhai Patel’s GST obligations for consultancy services provided to the Roads and Buildings (R&B) Department of the Gujarat government.

The original Advance Ruling (GAAR) had refused the claim of Patel for exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-CT (R), which exempts pure services of the functions entrusted to Panchayats (Article 243G) and Municipalities (Article 243W) of the Constitution of India.

Read Also: A Complete Guide On Job Work Under GST India

Patel is in a furnishing works contract services (WCS) and engineering consultancy, specifically preparing and providing plans, estimates, and Draft Tender Plans (DTP) for building works, claimed that such services come beneath the operations specified in the 11th and 12th schedules of the Constitution, hence qualified for exemption.

GAAR held against the same, quoting the absence of particular building information furnished by Patel at the time of the initial application. The GAAR provides the reason that without comprehending the nature and purpose of the buildings, it cannot decide if the services are pertinent to the Panchayat or the Municipality functions.

Patel at the time of the plea furnished a list of projects for which the consultancy services were furnished, a significant information missing from the original application. The same new data stirred the AAAR to acknowledge that the ruling of GAAR was incurred without acknowledging significant facts.

It was outlined by AAAR that u/s 101(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, it has the authority to authorize or modify rulings. However provided the new details and the need for its verification, the AAAR considered it precise to remand the case back to the GAAR for a fresh decision.

The AAAR drew parallels with precedents from the Central Excise Act, of 1944, and the Finance Act, of 1994, along with the rulings from other AAARs, to explain remanding the case. The decision outlines the significance of considering all pertinent facts and furnishing the appellant with an adequate chance for a hearing.

Applicant NameM/s Devendra Kantibhai Patel
GSTIN of the applicant24AZFPP1155R17ZX
Date21.01.2025
ApplicantShri Anish Goyal (CA) and Shri Dinesh Gabani
Gujarat GST AARRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Empowering Experts in India’s Taxation Industry

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates