• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Karnataka HC Orders Officials to Restore Petitioner’s GST Registration After Unjust Cancellation

Karnataka HC's Order in Case of A.R. Venugopal P W D Contractor Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

The Karnataka High Court in a judgment asked the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Department to restore the GST registration of the applicant within four weeks, following an unjust cancellation. The court remarked that the department committed a factual error.

The applicant, A R Venugopal who suffered from the GST registration cancellation as of the alleged non-submission of a reply to a SCN on October 20, 2020, contested the same decision in court.

The applicant asked to either quash the order of cancellation, direct reconsideration for revocation or condone any delay in filing the revocation application.

The counsel of the applicant claimed that the cancellation had consequences in difficulty since the applicant due to improper health was unable to operate the business without GST registration, which resulted in a late answer. Even after providing a response to the Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated November 3, 2020, the GST registration was cancelled incorrectly due to non-response.

Answering that the Additional Government Advocate repeated distinct contentions requested in the statement of objections and furnished that no merit in the petition was there and it is obligated to get dismissed.

Read Also: GSTIN Cancelled Due to Non-filing Returns, Karnataka HC Orders for Filing Revocation as per GST Notification

Justice S R Krishna Kumar assessed the cancellation order and concluded that the GST Department had made an error in fact by canceling the registration after they had obtained the petitioner’s reply.

It was remarked by the court that the same error asked to set aside the order of cancellation and reinstating the GST registration, subsequently, the HC asked the GST registration to be restored within 4 weeks, furnished that the applicant files all the due returns and pays the obligated taxes.

Case TitleA.R. Venugopal P W D Contractor Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
CitationWrit Petition No. 9370 OF 2024 (T-RES)
Date06.09.2024
For Petitioner bySMT. Vanaja M R.
For Respondent BySri. Hema Kumar
Karnataka High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates