• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Pune ITAT: Benefit Will Not Be Permitted Due to Non-deposit of TDS U/S 143(1)

Pune ITAT's Order for Mukesh Padamchand Sogani

According to a recent decision by the Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), if the tax was not deposited, the advantage of tax deduction at source shall not be granted in the intimation under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961.

According to Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, the income tax department is required to transmit a notification of which return is being submitted within a year of the end of the financial year.

Mukesh Padamchand Sogani, the assessee, served as Chief Operating Officer at Earth Water Limited (hence, “EWL”). In addition to submitting a return of income under the heading “Salaries,” the assessee also claimed credit for tax deductions made on such salary income.

The return was handled in accordance with section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, which only allowed for a credit of Rs. 83,483 for tax withheld at source from pay. The assessing officer also discovered certain discrepancies in the assessee’s remaining balance. The sum was thus not permitted. Assessee filed an appeal with ITAT against the ruling.

Dinesh Ramesh Gulabani, the assessee’s attorney, claims that from May 2018 onward, the employer Has failed to deposit the tax that was withheld at source from the employee’s income. Furthermore, it was claimed that starting in October 2018, the employer had stopped paying salaries.

The Revenue’s Ramnath P. Murkunde Counsel issued an Intimation pursuant to Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961 not granting credit for Rs. 8, 21,149 since Form No. 26AS did not reflect the same.

The ITAT division bench made up of R.S. Syal, vice president, and Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, judicial member, accepted the arguments made by both parties and allowed the assessee’s appeal, noting that “the requirement for allowing credit was only the amount of tax deducted at source and not the amount ultimately getting deposited with the Government after deduction.”

Read also: How Income Tax Rules Are Affecting TDS, You Pay on Services

Since Rs. 8,21,149 was duly deducted at source through the employer from the salaries credited or paid to the taxpayer for the year in question, the benefit of the withheld tax must be allowed in the notification pursuant to Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, even though it was not deposited.

Case TitleMukesh Padamchand Sogani vs ACIT
CitationITA No.29/PUN/2022
Date30.01.2023
Appellant byShri Dinesh Ramesh Gulabani
Respondent byShri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Pune ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Professionals

Super Tax Offer

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Big Offer for Tax Experts

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software