• twitter-icon

Search results for: pcit

Kolkata ITAT's Order for Bijni Dooars Tea Company Ltd

Mistake Occurred Due to Typographical Error, ITAT Kolkata Rejects Revision Order

The revision order has been set aside by the Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) as an accidental mistake because of the typographical error in computing the total income. PCIT asked for the issue in the revisionary proceedings related to the understatement of the short-term capital gain (STCG). For the taxpayer concern, Bijni […]

Delhi HC's Order for Wonder Bricks

Delhi HC Cancels Assessment Order Issued Before the Deadline to Respond to an SCN Had Even Expired

The Delhi High Court has invalidated an assessment order that was issued before the deadline for the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice had expired. Justices Rajiv Shakdher and Girish Kathpalia noted that the show cause notice was issued on March 31, 2023, providing the petitioner with a deadline of May 5, 2023 […]

Hyderabad ITAT's Order for Smt. Madhu Devi

ITAT Hyderabad: Flat Ownership for at Least Three Years is Needed to Claim LTCG

Without owning flats for at least three years the long-term capital gain could not be claimed, the Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled. PCIT is been justified in invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the IT (Income Tax) Act. as the taxpayer without holding the 7 flats for three years from […]

Kerala HC's Order for South Coast Spices Exports Pvt. Ltd

DIN Not Mandatory in Satisfaction Note Documented by Authority, Kerala HC Supports Proceedings U/S 153C

The Kerala High Court has upheld the validity of proceedings conducted under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that there is no mandatory requirement for a Director Identification Number (DIN) in the satisfaction note documented by the Assessing Authority. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh’s bench has dismissed the writ petition, stating, “It cannot be […]

Hyderabad ITAT's Order for Smt. Madhu Devi Jain

Hyderabad ITAT: Capital Gain Deduction U/S 54F Not Applicable Without Owning Flats for Atleast 3Yr

The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that in order to claim a capital gain deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it is essential to retain ownership of residential flats for a minimum period of three years. The taxpayer in question is an individual with income […]

Jharkhand HC’s Order for PCIT Ranchi

Jharkhand HC Clarifies Section 234B Interest Applicable to Assessed Income Not Returned

The Jharkhand High Court has determined that, according to Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, interest should be applied to the assessed income rather than the returned income. In a ruling by Justices Rongon Mukhopadhyay and Justice Deepak Roshan, it was clarified that Section 234B mandates charging interest based on the assessed tax amount […]

Delhi HC's Order for Azure Retreat Pvt Ltd

Delhi HC Permits Travel Expenses as It is Related to Business and Not Personal by Directors

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the directors’ travel expenses were incurred for business purposes of the company. In this case, the bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Girish Kathpalia observed that there was no evidence presented by the Assessing Officer (AO) to establish that these expenses were of a personal nature. Consequently, […]

Jaipur ITAT’s Order for M/s. Manglam Arts

ITAT: Late GST Payment is Not Considered a Penalty and Can Be Deducted U/S 37 of the I-T Act

The late payment of Tax collection at source (TCS) and Goods and Services Tax (GST) does not constitute a penalty and should, in fact, be eligible for deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently ruled. The taxpayer involved in this case […]

Mumbai ITAT’s Order for Virendra Bhavanji

Mumbai ITAT: Right to Sue Damage Comes Under Tax-Exempt Capital Receipt

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that damage related to the right to sue is considered a capital receipt and is not subject to taxation. The bench, comprising Amit Shukla (Judicial Member) and Amarjit Singh (Accountant Member), observed that Section 6 of the Transfer of Property Act explicitly outlines […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

New Offer for Tax Experts

Huge Discount on Tax Software

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software