• twitter-icon

Search results for: Section 74

Karnataka HC's Order In The Case of Bangalore Thulaseedas Srinath V/S IT Officer

Karnataka HC: 7 Days Should Be Granted for Responding to an Income Tax Notice Issued U/S 148a(b)

The applicant, Bangalore Thulaseedas Srinath contested several notices and orders issued to the applicant, including those u/s 148A(b), 148A(d), 148, 147 r/w 144 and 144B and pertinent penalty notices u/s 274 read with Sections 272A(1)(d), 270A and 271B. It was furnished by the applicant that the income tax notice issued u/s 148A(b) of the Act […]

Bangalore ITAT's Order In the Case of the Sekhon Jagtar Singh Vs ITO

Bangalore ITAT Cancels Tax Penalty U/S 270 Due to Misunderstanding of Non-filing of ITR

The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in a case quashed a tax penalty imposed u/s 270 of the Income Tax Act 1961, remarking that the taxpayer failed to file a Return due to a bona fide misunderstanding. The taxpayer Sekhon Jagtar Singh, in this case, is an individual who […]

Bangalore ITAT's Order In the Case of Shri Ramalingaiah Ramesh Vs ITO

ITAT Allows Rectification Due to Misleading Suggestion by Auditor, Leading to Higher Tax Payment

In a case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Bangalore ordered improvement of the amended return filed via the taxpayer, remarking that misadvice via the tax auditors of the taxpayer directed him to pay the excess income tax. The assessee Ramalingaiah, a semi-literate individual engaged in the business of tailoring and trading in textile […]

Calcutta HC's Order In The Case of Shishir Kumar Roy V/S Assistant Commissioner

Calcutta HC Lifts Attachment Order as Assessee Failed to File GST Appeal Due to Illness

The Goods and Service Tax Department who passed the attachment order has been quashed by the Calcutta High Court. It was discovered that the taxpayer is unable to file the GST appeal due to illness. The appellate authority is asked to hear out and dispose of the plea on merits, within 8 weeks from the […]

GST Controversy: SCI Receives ₹160 Crore Notice

SCI Faces GST Controversy: ₹160 Crore Demand Notice for FY 2019-20

INR 160 Crore goods and service tax (GST) demand notice has been imposed on the Shipping Corporation of India from the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Government of Maharashtra, for the financial year 2019-20, as per the filing of the company in the BSE. “The Company has received a order dated 28th August 2024 under […]

P&H HC's Order in Case of The land Acquisition Officer, Urban Estate Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

P&H HC Quashes ₹128 Cr Fine Imposed on LAO for Failure to Deduct TDS from Interest on Increased Compensation

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has set aside the hefty penalty of Rs.128 Crores levied on the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) for failing to deduct Tax Deduction At Source (TDS) on the interest on the surged compensation disbursed under the Land Acquisition Act. It was remarked by the court that the officer followed the […]

Madras HC's Order In Case of Abhinaya Constructions Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC: Commissioner Can Select the Right Officer for GST Assessment Under the TNGST Act

The Madras High Court held that the GST commissioner could designate the proper officers for the assessment under the TNGST ( Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax ) Act, 2017. The taxpayer Abhinaya Constructions contested the impugned GST orders because the commissioner of GST had no authority to charge the power to the third respondent […]

Chennai ITAT's Order For Shri Chandra Bhavani Sankar V/S ITO

Chennai ITAT Permits Tax Deduction U/S 54F for Construction of a New Residential Unit

The deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act on the construction of the new dwelling/residential unit has been permitted by the Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The bench of Aby T. Varkey (Judicial Member) and Amitabh Shukla (Accountant Member) has marked that the taxpayer had released the burden to prove […]

Allahabad HC's Order In The Case OF M/S Bgr Energy Systems Ltd V/S. State of U.P

Allahabad HC: When Insolvency Resolution Process is Undergoing Then GST Order Can’t Be Issued U/S 73

Order Section 73 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 cannot be passed to a company under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Allahabad High Court ruled. Section 73 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 designates a proper officer to start proceedings if he […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software