• twitter-icon

Search results for: gst refund

New Update on GST Refund Filing for Deemed Export Recipients

GSTN Makes GST Refunds Easier for Recipients of Deemed Exports

For the GST refund filing process, GSTN has announced an update under the category “On account of Refund by Recipient of Deemed Export”, aimed at easing the process and rectifying the taxpayer’s experience. Main Key Highlights Here are some important key highlights of GST refunds for recipients of deemed exports:- Compulsory GST Return Filing Taxpayers […]

GST Updates in Refund Filing Process for Various Categories

GSTN Eases GST Refund Filing Process Across Key Categories

GSTN has announced an important update in several areas to make easy GST refund filing process easier in the following categories- Key Highlights Here are the major key highlights of the GST refund filing process in different categories:- Tax Compliance Pre-filing All pertinent GST returns (GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, etc.) are to be filed up to the […]

Delhi HC's Order In The Case of Bhavna Luthra L/H Of Sh. Narain Das Luthra, Proprietor Of M/S. Hunny Enterprises V/S Assistant Commissioner

Delhi HC Voices Concern Over Widow’s Struggle for GST Refund from Deceased Husband’s Firm

The Delhi High Court has recorded the ‘harrowing experience‘ of a widow being required to seek a GST refund from the tax department. The firm’s GST registration, owned by her now deceased husband, was cancelled on his death. Though his widow asked for a refund of Rs 10,45,793 in the electronic cash ledger of the […]

Jharkhand HC's Order in The Case of M/s. BLA Infrastructure Private Limited vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC: Rejection of GST Refund Claim for Statutory Pre-Deposit on Limitation Grounds is Invalid

In a ruling, the Jharkhand High Court determined that denying a claim for a refund of a regulatory pre-deposit made under Section 107(6)(b) of the GST Act is not legally sustainable if the claim was submitted after the two-year limitation period outlined in Section 54(1). The Division Bench comprising Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice […]

Madras HC's Order in The Case of M/s.Gillette Diversified Operations Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Madras HC: GST Refund Claim Cannot Be Denied Based on Retrospective Application of Rule 90(3) Proviso

Discovering that the GST refund claim was filed within 2 years from the “relevant date” as specified in Explanation 2(a) to Section 54(14) of the CGST Act, the Madras High Court clarified that a refund claim cannot be refused based on the retrospective operation of the Proviso to Rule 90(3) of the CGST Rules. The […]

Madras HC's Order in Case of The Assistant Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s.Modern India Products

Madras HC: IGST Refund Claim Valid Alongside Duty Drawback Under Sections 74 & 75

The Hon’ble Madras High Court of Madurai Bench in the case of M/s Modern India Products v. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs House IGST Section & Ors. [Writ Appeal (MD) No. 1559 of 2021 dated February 21, 2025], has permitted the refund claim via the taxpayer of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (“the IGST”) […]

Gujarat HC's Order for M/s Kashi Exports vs. Union of India

CBIC Circular on Adjusting Total Turnover: Gujarat HC Remands Case for GST Refund Reconsideration

In the case of Kashi Exports vs Union of India & Ors. (2024), the Gujarat HC instructed tax officials to take another look at a request for a refund associated with GST made by Kashi Exports. The matter is towards the computation of the adjusted total turnover under Rule 89(4) of the CGST Rules. Kashi […]

Gujarat HC's Order in Case of Messrs Aalidhra Texcraft Engineers & ANR. vs. Union of India & ORS

Gujarat HC Orders GST Refund of INR 40 Lakhs to Assessee Due to System Error, Without Interest

The bench of Justices Bhargav D Karia and D N Ray, quoting Joshi Technologies International and Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation stated that amounts filed via mistake or ignorance cannot be retained by the Revenue. The applicant is in the manufacturing of textile machinery and equipment and is registered under the GST Act, 2017. The […]

Bombay HC's Order in The Case of Credit Agricole CIB Services Private Limited vs. The Union of India & Ors.

Bombay HC: GST Refund Rejection Without Hearing Violates CGST Rules 92(3) and Principles of Natural Justice

It was cited by the Bombay High Court that the rejection of the refund order has passed without hearing the chance that breaches rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017 and principles of natural justice. The Bench of Justices M. S. Sonak and Jitendra Jain marked that “……in any event, proviso to Rule 92(3) of the […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Current GST Due Dates