• twitter-icon

Search results for: mumbai itat

Mumbai ITAT's Order In the Case of Shalaka Chandrahas Chavan vs ITO

Mumbai ITAT: Assessing Officer Must Examine Source of Funds Despite ITR Technical Errors

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that the assessing officer cannot skip the examination of the source of funds just because of the error in the income tax return (ITR) due to technical issues. Relief was provided by the tribunal to a woman who sold her property for Rs 94 lakh […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order in the Case of Attivo Protezione Pvt Ltd vs. ITO

Mumbai ITAT Dismisses Appeal: Tax Consultant’s Failure Is Not ‘Sufficient Cause’ for 1,370-Day Delay

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the appeal based on inordinate delay of 1,370 days in filing, holding that the taxpayer’s reliance on its tax consultant’s failure to advise remedial action does not comprise “sufficient cause” for condonation u/s 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. An order dated 29 […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In the Case of Tata International Limited Provident Fund vs. ITO

Mumbai ITAT Restores Case to AO for Tax Exemption U/S 10(25)(ii) Denied Due to Wrong ITR Form

The Mumbai ITAT restored the case to the AO, holding that denying the Section 10(25)(ii) exemption solely because the assessee used the wrong ITR form was only a procedural lapse. The taxpayer, Tata International Limited Provident Fund, whose income was waived u/s Section 10(25)(ii) of the Act, had filed its income return in Form ITR-7 […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order in The Case of Payal Kishore Kulchandani vs. Income Tax Officer

Mumbai ITAT Allows LTCG Exemption on Sale of Old Flat with Timely Possession of New Property

The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) permitted the claim of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) exemption u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act,1961 on the sale of an old flat, as the possession of the new flat was received within the specified period. The taxpayer, Payal Kishore Kulchandani, submitted her return reporting […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order in the Case of Schindler India Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Mumbai ITAT Allows Company to Exclude Written-Off Bad Debts from MAT Computation U/S 115JB

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed Schindler India Private Limited, a leading elevator and escalator manufacturer, to exclude ₹1,09,72,163 written off as bad and doubtful debts from its book profits while computing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Before the ITAT, Schindler […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In Case of Anil Dattaram Pitale vs. Income Tax Officer

Mumbai ITAT Rules No Tax on Redevelopment Flats U/S 56(2)(x)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, in a decision, has ruled that a new flat value received in a redevelopment project could not be levied to tax as Income from Other Sources’ u/s 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act. Increasing project redevelopment has been seen in Mumbai. Over 31,000 redevelopment projects had been approved as […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In the Case of Janak Texturisers Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO

Mumbai ITAT Directs Rental Income from Factory Premises to be Assessed per Section 57 of Income Tax Act

Janak Texturisers Pvt. Ltd. (the assessee) has filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai against a reassessment order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2010-11. The issue concerns the validity of the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the assessing […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In the Case of Crisil Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Mumbai ITAT: TDS Disallowance on Reimbursements Was Unjustified Due to Tax Compliance

It was carried by the Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that the disallowance of ₹1.07 Crore for non-deduction of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on reimbursements u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act,1961 was not justified as of the tax compliance. The applicant Crisil Limited had been assessed under section 143(3) with an […]

Mumbai ITAT's Order In the Case of Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. DCIT

Mumbai ITAT: Section 80-IB Does Not Require Setting Off Losses from One Eligible Unit Against Profits of Another for Tax Deduction

The Mumbai ITAT has mentioned that an industrial undertaking was not mandated to set off the losses made by it in one qualified unit against the profits made from the other qualified unit for the objective of computing the deduction under section 80-IB. As per Section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the gross total […]

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Best Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Easy to File Tax/GST Returns

Upto 20% Off on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software