• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹23 Lakh Addition U/S 69A, Accepts Tree & Mango Sale Proceeds as Source

Delhi ITAT's Order In the Case of Mukesh Vs Income Tax Officer

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) removed a Rs 23 lakh addition u/s 69A after considering that the money deposited by the taxpayer’s husband in her bank account came via the sale of standing trees and mangoes and was saved for their daughter’s marriage.

Taxpayer, Mukesh Lane, contested the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which had verified the addition of Rs 23 lakh as unexplained money.

As per the taxpayer, her husband deposited the amount in her bank account from the sale of trees and mangoes. It was said that the money was kept in the account for performing the marriage of their daughter, which took place in 2013.

The tribunal said that some proof had been provided to the CIT(A), but no remand report was asked for before the addition was confirmed.

Recommended: Cuttack ITAT Deletes ₹5.01 Lakh Addition U/S 69A; Holds Demonetisation-Era Cash Deposits Were Business Receipts

The counsel of the taxpayer before the tribunal furnished an affidavit of her husband, Sukhpal Singh, confessing ownership of the money. They placed reliance on revenue records exhibiting ownership and possession of agricultural land.

The taxpayer provided affidavits from the purchasers, geo-tagged evidence exhibiting the agricultural land and plantation, bank records and other supporting documents. Dharam Kanta parchies or weighment slips showing the weight, rate, amount and receipt of sale consideration were also submitted as additional proof.

The single-member bench Madhumita Roy (Judicial Member) said that, “Examination of the substantial evidence duly placed before us establishes that the source of cash deposit made by the husband of the assessee amounting to Rs. 23,00,000/- in the bank account on 09.04.2011 is justified as the same is admittedly out of the sale proceeds of the standing popular trees and mangoes in March, 2011 itself. The entire addition is thus deleted.”

The tribunal removed the entire Rs 23 lakh addition made u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act and permitted the appeal of the taxpayer.

Case TitleMukesh Vs Income Tax Officer
Case No.ITA No. 3224/Del/2026
Assessee byRatnesh Awasthi, Pradeep Sharma
Revenue byShri Manoj Kumar
Delhi ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software