• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


ITAT Ahmedabad Grants Relief to Taxpayer in ₹28.92 Lakh Creditor Addition Case

Ahmedabad ITAT's Order In the Case of Pallavi Nileshbhai Shah Vs ITO

The Ahmedabad Bench ITAT has removed the Rs 28.92 lakh addition made against a taxpayer after discovering that the assessing officer cannot consider only the year-end outstanding creditor balances as unexplained while considering the rest of the same transactions as genuine.

The bench of Accountant Member Annapurna Gupta and Judicial Member Suchitra Kamble said that:

“The AO has not made addition of the entire credits on account of the transaction carried out by the said parties, but, only of the outstanding balance of credit as at the end of the year, which means that he has partly accepted as genuine the credit which was repaid during the year, while the balance he has treated ingenuine without assigning any reason for this distinctive treatment.”

The taxpayer had contested the addition after the assessing officer considered outstanding balances of Rs 28.92 lakh in the names of AS Industries, Esskay Steel Industries, and M.J. Rana & Co. as unexplained cash credits, specifying the absence of creditor confirmations, ITR copies, and supporting purchase documents.

The taxpayer had filed ledger accounts, PAN details, and bank statements before the tribunal to exhibit that the outstanding dues, concerning scrap purchases and legal expenses, had been cleared in the subsequent year via banking channels.

The revenue had not contested the subsequent payments, the tribunal observed.

“Even otherwise, we have noted that the assessee had demonstrated to have paid off the entire outstanding balance in the succeeding year which fact that the Revenue had failed to controvert either in their orders below or even before us.”

Also Read: ITAT Jaipur Remands ₹76.31 Lakh Addition Case, Grants Taxpayer Another Chance

Although the tribunal maintained separate additions for the low household withdrawals and freight expenses for failure to deduct tax at source.

Case TitlePallavi Nileshbhai Shah Vs. Income Tax Officer
Case No.ITA No. 376/Ahd/2026
For PetitionerShri Chetan Agarwal
For RespondentShri Abhijit
Ahmedabad ITATRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.
View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

Tax Offer in 2026

Powering India's Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

New Offer in 2026

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software