• twitter-icon
Unlimited Tax Return Filing


Madras HC Directs IT Dept to Address Taxpayer’s Claim for Unpaid Interest on Sanctioned Refund

Madras HC's Order in The Case of Vinplex India Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -3

In the case of an income tax refund that was sanctioned with interest but paid without it, the Madras High Court directed the Income Tax Department to acknowledge and dispose of the taxpayer’s representation regarding the unpaid interest.

Vinplex India Private Limited, the applicant, submitted the writ petition asking for the interest to be filed with the refund, as the income tax department is not able to consider the representation. It was claimed that the income tax refund, along with the interest till October 2024, was duly sanctioned and communicated via the department via an email on 10.10.2024.

According to this, the court asked the respondents previously, through its order on 10.02.2025, to release the refund, including the sanctioned interest. The principal refund amount was credited, but the interest was skipped without elaboration.

Read Also: CBDT Directs Tax Officials to Monitor Top Advance Taxpayers, Check Fake Exemption Claims

The Junior Standing Counsel, representing the department, does not contradict the arrangement of events and left the case to the discretion of the Court.

The Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Court discovered merit in the issues of applicant. It was marked by the court that the sanctioned refund, along with the interest, and no justification was there for keeping it after the applicant brought the issue to the attention of the department via a formal representation.

The court held that “In the present case, the refund of a sum of Rs. 3,71,04,013/-, which includes the interest amount for the period till October 2024, was sanctioned by the respondents to the petitioner vide e-mail dated 10.10.2024. Hence, this Court, vide order dated 10.02.2025, has directed the respondents to refund the amount along with interest as stated in the aforesaid e-mail.”

Important: GCCI Urges FM to Extend ITR Deadline Due to Delays in Filing Utilities

As per that, the HC asked the income tax department to regard and dispose of the representation of the applicant on 11.03.2025 on its own merits and in compliance with the law within 4 weeks from the receipt date of the order of the court.

Case TitleVinplex India Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -3
Case No.W.P.No.4624 of 2025
For The PetitionerMr.Karthik Sundaram
For The RespondentsMs.S.Premalatha, Mr.V.Mahalingam
Madras High CourtRead Order

Disclaimer:- "All the information given is from credible and authentic resources and has been published after moderation. Any change in detail or information other than fact must be considered a human error. The blog we write is to provide updated information. You can raise any query on matters related to blog content. Also, note that we don’t provide any type of consultancy so we are sorry for being unable to reply to consultancy queries. Also, we do mention that our replies are solely on a practical basis and we advise you to cross verify with professional authorities for a fact check."

Published by Arpit Kulshrestha
Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous. View more posts
SAGINFOTECH PRODUCTS

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us on Google News

Google News

Latest Posts

Big Offer on All Software

Powering India’s Taxation Experts with Innovation

Upto 20% Off
Tax, ROC/MCA, XBRL, Payroll, Online GST

Limited Offer, Hurry

Tax Offer 2025

Upto 20% Discount on Tax Software

    Select Product*

    Genius Software