On May 20, 2024, in the case of Excellentvision Technical Academy Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. [Writ Tax No. 554 of 2023, the Allahabad High Court highlights the need for the Revenue Department to record reasons in INS-01 before initiating search proceedings under Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017.
It has been ruled by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court that where the Revenue Department loses to place the actual reasons to trust as needed u/s 67 of the CGST, 2017 before executing the investigation, in these matters the whole proceedings have been obligated to get quashed. The same decision shows the necessity of compliance with the procedural pre-requisite to keep the validity of the investigation.
The UP GST department searched the M/s. Excellentvision Technical Academy (P.) Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) on 4th January 2018, nextly the council issued two INS-01 (search warrants), on two different dates: one on January 4, 2018 (date of the search) and the other on February 11, 2019.
Thereafter the tax department initiated the proceedings via issuing the SCN on 8th February 2021 u/s 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the State GST Act”) and subsequently passed the order on September 01, 2021.
Dissatisfied with the search that the tax department performed, the applicant filed the writ petition to the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court arguing that the tax department never proposed the reasons to assume for conducting the investigation which is obligatory u/s 67 of the State GST Act.
Issuance of 2 INS-01 on different dates, itself creates suspicion on the genuineness of the authorization to the proper officer to perform the inspection, search, and seizure.
Both the INS-01 do not include “reasons to believe” by the Joint Commissioner to initiate the proceedings against the applicant, hence, the proceedings initiated u/s 67 is illegal and exposed to be set aside, as per the applicant.
Whether recording a reason to consider in INS-01 a requirement for the tax department to initiate the search proceedings?
The Hon’ble “Allahabad” High Court in Writ Tax No. 554 of 2023 ruled as under:
Closure: In the case of Excellentvision Technical Academy Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P., the Allahabad High Court’s ruling acts as a reminder for the tax authorities to comply with the procedural pre-requisite when executing the investigation.
Read Also: GST Proceedings Are Invalid Without a Document Identification Number
The cruciality of clarity and accountability in tax administration has been highlighted in the decision of the court to quash the proceedings due to the lack of recorded reasons in INS-01. The same ruling carried the rights of the assesses and supports the stationery framework controlling the tax searches under the GST regime.
Case Title | M/s Excellentvision Technical Academy Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of U P |
Citation | WRIT TAX No. – 554 of 2023 |
Date | 20.05.2024 |
For the Petitioner | Aditya Pandey, Bipin Kumar Pandey |
For the Respondents | C.S.C. |
Allahabad High Court | Read Order |
An advisory has been released by the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) which notifies…
It was cited by the Delhi HC that the two adjudication orders against one SCN…
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in an update for the taxpayers via the…
In October, Gross GST collection surged to 9% to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, the second…
Goods and Services Tax (GST) is to get paid on the procurement of materials and…
The Bombay High Court carried that as the revocation orders for the registration cancellation on…