Tamil Nadu AAR: 18% GST Levy on Toys Consisting Electronic Parts

The Tamil Nadu bench of the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) ruled that 18% GST on toys comprises electronic objects no matter in what way they are used.

The petitioner owner of M/s Navabharat Importers are regular importers and traders of toys via different countries and sell these goods in retail and via e-commerce platforms. They mentioned that they indeed have the purpose to manufacture these toys in India in subsequent time.

The issue towards AAR bench was that when the physical force is the main execution of a toy and when the light and music are ancillary for that than whether it is to come beneath the “Electronic Toys” or “other than Electronic Toys”?

Read Also: TDS Deduction Guidance by Seller of E-commerce Platforms

The bench sees that toys that are majorly operated through manual force or are needed to be manually forced are acknowledged as non-electronic toys and the toys operated through the use of electricity or power generated from the batteries whether chargeable or replaceable are regarded as an electronic toys.

Judges K PhanindraReddy and M.V.S Chaudhary revealed that the common parlance itself needs to be subjected in absence of the definition of the Electronic toy in the provided notification or in the act.

Judges mentioned that the decision of the Madras High court for Southern Refractories & Minerals Vs. The state of Tamil Nadu ruled that in understanding the entries in taxing schedules the effective meaning must be provided to these terms and the classification built through the Indian standard Institution for the goods in question can be practiced to find out the mentioned known or commercial meaning. Thus the reference of the standard subject to the toys depends on through the Tamil Nadu Advance Ruling Authority is a part of common parlance to ascertain the term Electronic Toys.

The judgment has been announced with detailed compliance and here we have added the complete judgment in the original format to offer a clear understanding of the said rule.

Arpit Kulshrestha

Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.

Recent Posts

No GST Returns Will Be Accepted If Filed More Than 3 Years Past Their Due Date

An advisory has been released by the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) which notifies…

12 hours ago

Delhi HC: Two Judgment Orders Against One SCN Cannot Be Accepted for the Same Period

It was cited by the Delhi HC that the two adjudication orders against one SCN…

14 hours ago

CBDT Allows Electronic Filing of Forms 3CEDA and 3C-O Via Notification No. 5/2024

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in an update for the taxpayers via the…

15 hours ago

October 2024 Records the 2nd Highest GST Collection, Driven by Domestic Sales

In October, Gross GST collection surged to 9% to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, the second…

17 hours ago

UP AAR: GST Will Be Levied on the Installation of Electricity Distribution Systems by DISCOMs

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is to get paid on the procurement of materials and…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Quashes Rejection Order for Voluntary GST Cancellation Due to Lack of Stated Reasons

The Bombay High Court carried that as the revocation orders for the registration cancellation on…

3 days ago