SC Supports Validity of I-T Provisions on Interest-Free Loans to Bank Employees Under Rule 3(7)(i)

Supreme Court held on the taxation of interest-free/concessional loans to bank employees. This blog furnishes an in-depth analysis of the judgment, analyzing the legal framework, challenges, and implications of the decision.

Around the interpretation of Section 17(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of the Income Tax Rules, the case is focused on. The applicants along with the staff unions and officers associations of distinct banks, contested the vires of such provisions claiming against the taxation of interest-free/concessional loans provided by banks to their employees.

Section 17(2)(viii) describes ‘perquisites’ to contain ‘any additional fringe benefit or amenity’, as defined. Rule 3(7)(i) determines that interest-free/concessional loan benefits delivered by banks to employees are levied to tax as perquisites if the interest levied by the bank is lower compared to the Prime Lending Rate (PLR) of the State Bank of India.

The applicant asked concerns regarding the excessive delegation of the legislative function to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and claimed that Rule 3(7)(i) was arbitrary and breached Article 14 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court denied such arguments, asserting the provision’s validity.

The court stressed that the delegation of legislative authority should be within the parent legislation and should not amount to abdication of critical legislative functions. It carried that Section 17(2)(viii) delivered sufficient direction to the CBDT for formulating rules, and Rule 3(7)(i) was uniform with the legislative policy and norms stipulated in the Act.

The court concerning the benchmarking of interest rates to the PLR of SBI considered the same rational and non-arbitrary. It learned that the interest rates of SBI influence those of other banks and that those who use a single benchmark ensure consistency and clarity in taxation. The Court concluded that Rule 3(7)(i) was established on a fair determining principle and did not breach Article 14.

The decision of the Supreme Court to keep the taxation of interest-free/concessional loans to bank employees reaffirms the legality of Rule 3(7)(i) under the Income Tax Rules. On the taxation of fringe benefits, the judgment delivers clarity and highlights the importance of consistency and justice in tax legislation.

Case TitleAll India Bank Officers’ Confederation Vs Regional Manager
CitationCivil Appeal No. 7708 of 2014
Date07.05.2024
Supreme CourtRead Order
Arpit Kulshrestha

Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.

Recent Posts

No GST Returns Will Be Accepted If Filed More Than 3 Years Past Their Due Date

An advisory has been released by the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) which notifies…

14 hours ago

Delhi HC: Two Judgment Orders Against One SCN Cannot Be Accepted for the Same Period

It was cited by the Delhi HC that the two adjudication orders against one SCN…

16 hours ago

CBDT Allows Electronic Filing of Forms 3CEDA and 3C-O Via Notification No. 5/2024

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in an update for the taxpayers via the…

17 hours ago

October 2024 Records the 2nd Highest GST Collection, Driven by Domestic Sales

In October, Gross GST collection surged to 9% to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, the second…

19 hours ago

UP AAR: GST Will Be Levied on the Installation of Electricity Distribution Systems by DISCOMs

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is to get paid on the procurement of materials and…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Quashes Rejection Order for Voluntary GST Cancellation Due to Lack of Stated Reasons

The Bombay High Court carried that as the revocation orders for the registration cancellation on…

3 days ago