Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order Issued to Deceased Person

High Court of Madras in an updated GST judgment, the problem of assessment orders issued before the deceased person was addressed. The matter engaged Munusamy Nagabushanam who was represented by his legal heir, Nethaji Nagabushanam. ​

The same blog will examine the essential attributes of the judgment and discuss its implications concerning Goods and Services Tax (GST) law. The applicant argued that the assessment orders were issued after the demise of his father, and thus, were non-sustainable.

The counsel of the applicant mentioned that the assessment orders were not valid since they were issued to a deceased person. He carried his contention by presenting the death certificate and legal heirship certificate, indicating that the impugned orders were after his demise.

The Honourable Justice post acknowledging the contentions put forth by both parties furnished an order. The applicant’s argument has been accepted by the court which ruled that the AO issued before the deceased person could not be sustained. Therefore, on 19.09.2023, the impugned orders were set aside.

The court in its order left the same open for the respondent to execute the proceedings against the legal heirs. The same implies that the tax authorities could seek the recovery of any outstanding tax liabilities from the legal heirs of the deceased.

Read Also: Delhi HC Directs GST Dept to Cancel GSTIN from Death Date of the Proprietor Instead Retrospectively

High Court of Judicature at Madras in its judgment emphasizes the importance of ensuring that assessment orders are issued to the correct and legally acknowledged entities.

In this matter, the court set aside the assessment orders issued before a deceased person. However, the tax authorities need to initiate proceedings against the legal heirs to recover any outstanding tax liabilities.

Case TitleMunusamy Nagabushanam Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Order NoW.P.Nos.14718 & 14723 of 2024
Date13.06.2024
For PetitionerMr.L.Dinesh
For RespondentMr.T.N.C.Kaushik, AGP (T)
Madras High CourtRead Order
Arpit Kulshrestha

Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.

Recent Posts

No GST Returns Will Be Accepted If Filed More Than 3 Years Past Their Due Date

An advisory has been released by the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) which notifies…

14 hours ago

Delhi HC: Two Judgment Orders Against One SCN Cannot Be Accepted for the Same Period

It was cited by the Delhi HC that the two adjudication orders against one SCN…

16 hours ago

CBDT Allows Electronic Filing of Forms 3CEDA and 3C-O Via Notification No. 5/2024

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in an update for the taxpayers via the…

17 hours ago

October 2024 Records the 2nd Highest GST Collection, Driven by Domestic Sales

In October, Gross GST collection surged to 9% to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, the second…

19 hours ago

UP AAR: GST Will Be Levied on the Installation of Electricity Distribution Systems by DISCOMs

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is to get paid on the procurement of materials and…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Quashes Rejection Order for Voluntary GST Cancellation Due to Lack of Stated Reasons

The Bombay High Court carried that as the revocation orders for the registration cancellation on…

3 days ago