SAG Infotech Official Tax Blog Huge Discount for Tax Experts

Madras HC: No Tax Recovery As Per Differences B/W GSTR 1 & 3B Without Following CGST Rule 88C

Madras HC's Order for M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd.

In the case of M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner Chennai [WP No. 28092 of 2023 dated September 25, 2023], the Madras High Court granted the writ petition, affirming that recovery based solely on variations between Form GSTR-1 and Form GSTR-3B is impermissible without adherence to the prerequisites outlined in Rule 88C of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“CGST Rules”).

Points:

The petition, lodged by M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”), contested the recovery notice issued on September 13, 2023 (“the Impugned Notice”) by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”). The challenge centred on the failure to follow the procedural safeguards specified under Rule 88C of the CGST Rules, introduced through Notification No. 26/2022 dated December 26, 2022. Despite the Petitioner’s response, the Respondent sought to initiate recovery proceedings under Section 75(12) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) in conjunction with Rule 88C of the CGST Rules.

Case:

If Form GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 differ, can recovery proceedings be operated without conceding with Rule 88C of the CGST Rules?

Had:

In the case of W.P. No. 28092 of 2023, the Hon’ble Madras High Court held under the:

Appropriate Provisions Under CGST Rule 80C:

The way of dealing with difference in obligation reported in the statement of outward supplies and that reported in the return

Tax Recovery Under GST Section 79:

Illustration– For this section, the word person shall include “distinct persons” as referred to in subsection (4) or, as the case may be, sub-section (5) of section 25.

General Provisions Under GST Section 75(12):

Notwithstanding anything included in section 73 or section 74 in which any amount of self-assessed tax as per the return filed under section 39 left unpaid either entirely or party or any amount of the interest subject to get paid on these tax left unpaid the identical under the provision of section 79 shall be recovered.

Illustration – For the objective of such sub-section, the expression of “self-assessed tax” will comprise the tax liable to get paid for the information of the outward supplies filed under section 37 however does not comprise in the return filed under section 39.

Case TitleM/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Case No.W.P.No.28092 of 2023
Date25.09.2023
Counsel For PetitionerMr.Raghavan Ramabadran, M/s.Lakshmi Kumaran, Sridharan Attorneys
Counsel For RespondentsMr.A.P.Srinivas, Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap
Kerala High CourtRead Order
Exit mobile version