ITAT Denies TDS Applicability on Salary, Commissions, etc to Partner by Firm

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench ruled that the finding of the id. CIT(A), acknowledging the provisions of Explanation 2 to Section 15 of the Act that consists of the salary, bonus, commission, or remuneration obtained via partner beneath the head ‘salary’ and considering the provisions of section 192 of the Act specified about the salary provided u/s. 15 of the Act, hence no need beneath the provisions of the act for the deduction of tax at source via the partnership firm on salary, bonus, commission or remuneration, and others or any other name called given or credited to a partner of a firm.

Recommended: Easy Guide to Read & Check Income Tax Intimation U/S 143(1)

The assessee is a partnership firm that is involved in the construction industry, according to the case’s brief facts. for the AY 2017-18, the Income of Rs.1,21,98,600/- was declared in the e-return filed on 16-10-2017. The case was chosen for investigation via CASS for the high ratio of the TDS refund, the large value refund claim, and the large rise in the capital in a year. Valid notices u/s. 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act were provided. On the basis of the non-deduction of tax at source on the commission paid to its partners one of the disallowances was established.

The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) removed this disallowance, and The ACIT has appealed this decision to the ITAT.

According to ACIT, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) erred in ruling that the commission given to partners shall not be treated as Salary under Explanation to Section 15 of the Act and that the Salary-related provision of Section 192 would not apply in this case.

The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), according to the ACIT, disregarded the fact that commission payments are covered by Section 194H of the Act, which meant the assessee was required to deduct TDS under that Section and in accordance with Section 197(2).

Case TitleM/s. Dhar Construction Company Vs ACIT
CitationITA No.181/GAU/2020
Date02.01.2023
Appellant ByShri Gaurav Chandak, FCA,
Ld. AR
Respondent ByShri I. Gyaneshori Devi, JCIT,
Ld. SR-DR
ITAT GauhatiRead Order
Arpit Kulshrestha

Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.

Published by
Arpit Kulshrestha

Recent Posts

No GST Returns Will Be Accepted If Filed More Than 3 Years Past Their Due Date

An advisory has been released by the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) which notifies…

6 hours ago

Delhi HC: Two Judgment Orders Against One SCN Cannot Be Accepted for the Same Period

It was cited by the Delhi HC that the two adjudication orders against one SCN…

8 hours ago

CBDT Allows Electronic Filing of Forms 3CEDA and 3C-O Via Notification No. 5/2024

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in an update for the taxpayers via the…

9 hours ago

October 2024 Records the 2nd Highest GST Collection, Driven by Domestic Sales

In October, Gross GST collection surged to 9% to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, the second…

11 hours ago

UP AAR: GST Will Be Levied on the Installation of Electricity Distribution Systems by DISCOMs

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is to get paid on the procurement of materials and…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Quashes Rejection Order for Voluntary GST Cancellation Due to Lack of Stated Reasons

The Bombay High Court carried that as the revocation orders for the registration cancellation on…

3 days ago