HC Revokes SCN Under GST Section 74(1) Due to Rule 142(1)(a) Violation

In violation of Rule 142(1)(a) of the GST Rules, the Jharkhand High Court division bench has quashed the order in the summary of GST show cause notice without issuing show cause notice pursuant to Section 74(1).

As the portion of the search performed via the respondents on the premises of the petitioner, M/s. Juhi Industries Pvt. Ltd. beneath Section 67 of the JGST Act two summary of show-cause notices in Form DRC-01 were given, one for the period from 01.07.2017 to 13.8.2018 and another for the period from April 2018 to 31.8.2018 under Section 74(1) of the JGST Act.

The applicant beneath the bonafide and mistaken belief of the law furnished its answer in Form DRC-06 specifying the GST Input tax credit that he has claimed legally and the goods would be obtained through them. The respondent has passed two separate orders both beneath section 74(9) of the JGST Act and confirmed tax demand, interest, and penalty, and issued a Summary of Order. The aggrieved taxpayer liked a writ petition to the jurisdictional High.

The counsel towards the applicant submitted that Rule 142(1)(a) of the JGST rules furnished that the summary of the show cause notice in Form DRC-01 must be given engaging a show-cause notice beneath section 74(1) which is essential and mandatory. The whole proceeding in both the cases is without any jurisdiction and the next proceedings would not be sustainable being the opposite of GST section 74(1) of the JGST act.

The tribunal sees that the foundation of the proceeding in both cases suffers from material anomaly therefore not sustainable being contrary to Section 74(1) of the JGST Act; therefore the next proceedings/impugned Orders cannot sanctify that. The Tribunal sees that the bonafide issue or the taxpayer’s permission shall not provide any jurisdiction on the proper officer. The jurisdiction should flow through the law. The rule of the estoppels is the direction of equity who would pose no part in taxation cases of taxation.

Mr Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Mr Justice Deepak Roshan considered in the Coram have refused the impugned the show cause notice and the final order ruled that “we are of the considered view that the impugned show cause notice in both the cases does not fulfil the ingredients of a proper show-cause notice and thus amounts to a violation of principles of natural justice, the challenge is maintainable in the exercise of writ jurisdiction of this Court”.

Arpit Kulshrestha

Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.

Recent Posts

No GST Returns Will Be Accepted If Filed More Than 3 Years Past Their Due Date

An advisory has been released by the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) which notifies…

14 hours ago

Delhi HC: Two Judgment Orders Against One SCN Cannot Be Accepted for the Same Period

It was cited by the Delhi HC that the two adjudication orders against one SCN…

16 hours ago

CBDT Allows Electronic Filing of Forms 3CEDA and 3C-O Via Notification No. 5/2024

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in an update for the taxpayers via the…

17 hours ago

October 2024 Records the 2nd Highest GST Collection, Driven by Domestic Sales

In October, Gross GST collection surged to 9% to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, the second…

19 hours ago

UP AAR: GST Will Be Levied on the Installation of Electricity Distribution Systems by DISCOMs

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is to get paid on the procurement of materials and…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Quashes Rejection Order for Voluntary GST Cancellation Due to Lack of Stated Reasons

The Bombay High Court carried that as the revocation orders for the registration cancellation on…

3 days ago