SAG Infotech Official Tax Blog Huge Discount for Tax Experts

HC: Purchasers are Only Liable for Verifying that the Seller is Registered for GST on Portal

AP HC's Order for M/s Arhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

The assessee is simply accountable for proving that he legitimately acquired the goods from the supplier for a fair price after checking the supplier GST registration on the GST portal, held by Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in M/s Arhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Assistant Commissioner [Writ Petition No.15481 of 2023 dated August 03, 2023].

Attributes:

M/s. Arhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) is a trader in iron scrap and Mr. T. Srinivasulu (“The Transporter”) is the vehicle’s owner where the applicant transported iron scrap.

From M/s. K.S. Enterprises (“the Supplier”) located in Vijayawada the Petitioner purchased the iron scrap (“the Goods”) and then sold it to M/s Radha Smelters Private Limited (“the Buyer”) located in Sankarampet under the valid GST invoice number.

The petitioner hired the transporter to move the goods from Vijayawada to Sankarampet with all the necessary legal paperwork, including an invoice, a waybill, a weighing slip, etc.

On the grounds that the supplier does not have a place of business in Vijayawada, the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) held the goods while they were in transit and commenced legal action against the supplier in accordance with Section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”).

The petitioner argued that the respondent purposefully disregarded the documentation provided during the check, proving the petitioner was the rightful owner of the items. According to Section 129 of the CGST Act, legal action may be taken against the person conveying the goods, in this case, the Petitioner.

The Respondent has served notice against the Supplier, who has no interest in the case after selling the consignment to the Petitioner for a substantial price, rather than bringing proceedings in the name of the Petitioner.

Also argued that there was no obligation for the Petitioner to confirm that the Supplier has a registered place of business in Vijayawada under the GST statute. The petitioner has correctly confirmed the supplier’s GST registration and has paid the consideration via bank account. However, the transaction that the Petitioner and the Supplier engaged in is unrelated to the Respondent’s reservations about the validity of the registration of the Supplier.

Problem:

Can the Revenue Department seize the Assessee’s goods based on the legal action taken against the Assessee’s supplier?

Held:

The Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court Writ Petition No.15481 of 2023 is held as under:

Case TitleM/s Arhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Assistant Commissioner
CitationWrit Petition Nos.15481, 15482, 15486 and 15487 of 2023
Date03.08.2023
Andhra Pradesh High CourtRead Order
Exit mobile version