SAG Infotech Official Tax Blog Huge Discount for Tax Experts

Guwahati HC: Upon Filing Due Returns & Paying Tax, Extra Charges and Penalties, GSTIN Will Be Restored

Guwahati High Court's Order for Sanjoy Nath

The esteemed Guwahati High Court, in the matter of Sanjoy Nath v. Union of India [WP No. 6366 of 2023, dated November 29, 2023], resolved the writ petition by instructing the Revenue Department to undertake requisite measures to reinstate the Petitioner’s GST registration, provided that the Petitioner is willing to adhere to all the stipulations outlined in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the Central GST Rules, 2017 (“the CGST Rules”). This entails the submission of outstanding returns and the settlement of taxes, inclusive of interest and penalties.

Revenue Department Facts

The Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) issued a Show Cause Notice dated July 8, 2022 (“the SCN”) to Sanjoy Nath (“the Petitioner”), a sole proprietorship firm, questioning why the Petitioner’s GST registration should not be revoked for failure to submit returns as mandated by Section 39 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) for a consecutive period of six months.

Subsequently, the Respondent, through an order dated August 11, 2022 (“the Impugned Order”), cancelled the Petitioner’s GST Registration under Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act, in conjunction with Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, citing the aforementioned reason.

Dissatisfied with the Impugned Order, the Petitioner initiated a writ petition before the esteemed Guwahati High Court seeking the reinstatement of the Petitioner’s GST registration.

Issue of Goods and Services Tax Registration

Can GST Registration be restored when the assessee submits overdue returns and settles the corresponding taxes, including interest and penalties?

Held of Guwahati High Court Case

The Hon’ble Guwahati High Court in the case of WP No. 6366 of 2023 held as under:

Relevance Provision:

Rule 22(4) of CGST Rules;

“Rule 22: Cancellation of Registration:-

(4) Where the reply furnished under sub-rule (2) or in response to the notice issued under sub-rule (2A) of rule 21A is found to be satisfactory, the proper officer shall drop the proceedings and pass an order in FORM GST REG–20:

Provided that where the person instead of replying to the notice served under sub-rule (1) for contravention of the provisions contained in clause (b) or clause (c) of subsection (2) of section 29, furnishes all the pending returns and makes full payment of the tax dues along with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer shall drop the proceedings and pass an order in FORM GST-REG- 20.”

Case TitleSanjoy Nath v. Union of India
CitationWP(C)/6366/2023
Date29.11.2023
Advocate For the PetitionerMS. M L GOPE
Advocate For RespondentSC, GST
Guwahati High CourtRead Order
Exit mobile version