Delhi HC Cancels Unsigned Order and GST SCN Notice [Read Judgment]

The unsigned show cause notice and assessment orders were revoked by the Delhi High Court (HC), presided over by Justices Vibhu Bharkru and Amit Mahajan. A total demand of Rs 49,26,623 has been made by the petitioner in this case, which challenges a judgement made by the adjudicating authority (assistant commissioner) under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST), 2017.

Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, allows for the determination of tax not paid, short paid, or incorrectly reimbursed, or input tax credit wrongfully claimed or used for any cause other than fraud, intentional deception, or suppression of facts.

The adjudication order must be issued in accordance with the provision no later than three years following the annual return deadline for the relevant year.

In the current instance, the court observed that it seems to be a generic letter stating that tax has not been paid or has been underpaid, refunds have been given in the wrong amount, or input tax credits have been mistakenly claimed or utilized. Obviously, this provides no information on the reasons behind the suggested measures. It should be observed that the signature of the relevant Officer does not appear on either the disputed order or the show cause notice.

The ruling cannot be upheld since it is unsigned, according to the bench, which cited the case Railsys Engineers Private Limited & Anr. v. The Additional Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (Appeals-II) & Anr.

The panel further noted that an unsigned notice or order cannot be taken into account as an order, contrary to what the Bombay High Court ruled in Ramani Suchit Malushte v. Union of India and Ors.

The Court chose to give the petitioner two weeks from the date of the ruling to reply to the show cause notices. Also instructed to give each person another opportunity to be heard.

Case TitleMarg ERP Limited Through Its Auth vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods And Service Tax
CitationW.P.(C) 872/2023
Date03.02.2023
Appellant byMr. A.K. Babbar & Mr. B.K. Tripathi
Respondent byMr Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Divyanshi Bansal
Delhi High CourtRead Order
Arpit Kulshrestha

Arpit Kulshrestha seeks higher interests in financial services, taxation, GST, I-T, etc. Writes articles with depth knowledge and is extensive for the same. The resources provide effective articles for the products of SAG infotech which provides taxation and IT software. Writing from observations and researching makes his articles virtuous.

Recent Posts

No GST Returns Will Be Accepted If Filed More Than 3 Years Past Their Due Date

An advisory has been released by the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) which notifies…

12 hours ago

Delhi HC: Two Judgment Orders Against One SCN Cannot Be Accepted for the Same Period

It was cited by the Delhi HC that the two adjudication orders against one SCN…

14 hours ago

CBDT Allows Electronic Filing of Forms 3CEDA and 3C-O Via Notification No. 5/2024

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in an update for the taxpayers via the…

15 hours ago

October 2024 Records the 2nd Highest GST Collection, Driven by Domestic Sales

In October, Gross GST collection surged to 9% to Rs 1.87 lakh crore, the second…

17 hours ago

UP AAR: GST Will Be Levied on the Installation of Electricity Distribution Systems by DISCOMs

Goods and Services Tax (GST) is to get paid on the procurement of materials and…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Quashes Rejection Order for Voluntary GST Cancellation Due to Lack of Stated Reasons

The Bombay High Court carried that as the revocation orders for the registration cancellation on…

3 days ago