Site iconSite icon SAG Infotech Official Tax Blog Upto 20% Off on Tax Software for You

Allahabad HC: GST ITC Should Not Be Denied Due to Incorrect GSTIN in GSTR-1

Allahabad HC’s Order for M/S Shree Krishna Traders

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court reviewed the matter of M/S Shree Krishna Traders Vs State of UP and another – 2023 (10) TMI 927 – Allahabad High Court and resolved the writ petition by overruling the impugned directive given.

The court remitted the case back to the revenue division for further study, instructing them to issue fresh orders considering the circular. This pertains to cases where Input Tax Credit (ITC) was denied on grounds of a discrepancy between Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A resulting from an incorrect GSTIN number of the recipient entered in Form GSTR-1.

Key Facts Regarding the Case

M/s Shree Krishna Traders, the petitioner in this matter, filed a writ petition questioning the proceedings composed following Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The revenue authority, the respondent in this case, issued a Notice on December 24, 2022, seeking to quash the order dated July 26, 2023, given under Section 74 of the UP GST/CGST Act for the FY 2017-18.

The petitioner’s counsel argued that as per Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST dated December 27, 2022, certain procedures outlined in Paragraph 4 of the circular should be followed when there is a discrepancy in ITC demanded by a registered person in Form GSTR-3B and the ITC available in GSTR-2A due to the supplier erroneously declaring the wrong GST Identification Number (GSTIN) of the recipient in Form GSTR-1.

The petitioner also highlighted that the allowance of ITC to the actual recipient should not depend on the completion of the step taken by the tax department of the registered individual mentioned incorrectly, and these moves should be pursued independently.

The petitioner further contended that the respondent failed to follow the procedures specified in Paragraph 4 of the Circular. The petitioner argued that the impugned order did not grant them the advantage under the GST Circular. Therefore, the petitioner requested that the order be set aside, and the matter be remitted back to the respondent for a fresh decision.

The Court’s Decision in This Matter

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, in the matter of M/S Shree Krishna Traders Vs State of UP and another – 2023 (10) TMI 927 – Allahabad High Court, made the following rulings:

Case TitleM/S Shree Krishna Traders vs State of U.P.
CitationWRIT TAX No. – 1106 of 2023
Date25.09.2023
Counsel for PetitionerAditya Pandey
Counsel for RespondentC.S.C.
Allahabad High CourtRead Order
Exit mobile version