Site iconSite icon SAG Infotech Official Tax Blog Upto 20% Off on Tax Software for You

All Updates of 42nd GST Council Meeting on Returns and Compensation

The 42nd GST Council meeting finally took place in New Delhi on 5th October 2020. The meeting chaired the finance minister Nirmala sitharaman and the Minister of State (MoS) for Finance Anurag Thakur along with finance minister of all the states.

The 42 GST council meeting has taken some major decision based on the GSTR 1 and 3B quarterly filing. Also, the meeting took concern on the revenue compensation and has said that it will announce decision on the upcoming 12th October on this issue. Other issues such as refund, HSN and facilities on the portal were stated.

However, the main focus of the 42nd GST Council meeting was not very clear but members had taken several GST return and compensation related decisions.

All Updates and Hightlights of the 42nd GST Council Meeting

Download 42nd GST Council Meeting Press Release

Expectation of 42th GST Council Meeting

The ministry also refused to borrow from the Center as suggested by some states, In this particular matter source said that Under the GST Act, the compensation cess is a tax under the ownership of the states and Article 292 of the Constitution. The Center can borrow on its own taxes and protection of resources which is the Consolidated Fund of India. The Ministry said that “It cannot borrow against the tax which it does not own”. In addition, it said that any borrowing by the Center would squeeze out the resources required for private professionals and it will also raise rates on government papers which actually is a benchmark in the market.

The ministry estimated that there will be a compensation requirement of Rs 3 trillion for the states and the compensation cess for the current financial year will be around Rs 65,000 crore, thus there is a difference of Rs 2.35 trillion. Of this difference, Rs 97,000 crore is due to the GST structure and the rest is due to the lockdown imposed to prevent the spread of the Covid-19 epidemic.

A finance ministry source said that “It has never been the stand of Union finance minister (Nirmala Sitharaman) that the loss of revenue due to Covid-19 would not be compensated. The Central government has, time and again, committed that the entitlement of the States would always be for full compensation,” He also added that the entire compensation sum on account of the shortfall would be paid and honoured.

In the last GST council meeting Get to know about GST (Goods and Services Tax) council 1st to 41th meeting updates and decisions taken by members. We have covered 1st meeting to last meeting decisions, the central government gave two options to the state governments. The first was an open window of Rs 97,000 crore from the Reserve Bank of India and the second was to borrow 5the entire shortfall of Rs 2.35 trillion from the markets for convenience by the central bank. The amount will be paid by compensation cess which will be carried forward from June 30, 2022.

Now if states decide to borrow the entire Rs 2.35 trillion shortfalls then they have to bear the interest burden. And in the other option, the extension of cess will only be used to pay the principal amount, not the interest.

Additionally in the first case borrowing under the special window will not be considered as the debt of stats but in the second option amount up to Rs 97000 crore will be not treated as debt. The states were given time till Tuesday to send their feedback, and as per updates, opposition ruled states accused the Centre of reneging on their promise whereas some BJP-ruled states such as Bihar and Karnataka opted for the first option.

Read Also: Goods and Services Tax Impact on Common Man Check The impact figure on a common man by GST. We covered several industries as Real Estate, Household, Taxi Services, Apparels and Footwear, Jewelry, Hotels, Air Travels and Restaurant

Sources in the ministry said that borrowing to meet the entire shortfall can hurt the private sector very badly as they are still recovering from the losses and current financial slowdown situation. Some recommended transferring the compensation cess to the Compensation Fund and release it for States and a few others are recommending the centre to borrow the funds.

However, one source who knows the matter has responded in this matter that “It is unarguable that since rates on Central government securities work as one of the benchmarks for market rates, any additional borrowings by the Centre would have a higher impact on the market rates than that by States. If the benchmark rates increase on account of borrowing by the Center, the states too will get impacted because it will increase their cost of borrowing”.

Therefore, some top sources believe that, in the current scenario, raising additional resources to meet the gap may be a safer option for states due to the unavailability of compensation. One top source added that “Since the repayment will come from the compensation cess, there is no reason why the rates would be different from each State. In fact, the debt window could be so packaged that it is State independent altogether”.

Exit mobile version