Browsing category

Taxes in India

Income tax category offers the audience with complete knowledge of income tax provisions and tax rates in India. Visit here for the latest and trending income tax news, articles, blog and amendments of IT.

ITAT Upholds Taxpayer’s Explanation for Cash Deposits, Cancelling Addition Made Due to Lack of Explanation

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has removed the addition made by the department since the cash deposits made from the taxpayer’s parents collected savings and income from agricultural activities. The bench of Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member) and Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member) noted that when the taxpayer furnishes a plausible explanation […]

Tax Officials Fail to Verify Sundry Creditors Before Invoking Section 41(1), ITAT Sends Matter to AO

The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the case to the Assessing Officer ( AO ) post remarking that the Income Tax Authorities were unable to discuss the difference in sundry creditors before confirming the addition u/s 41(1) Income Tax Act, 1961. The taxpayer Jonna Iron Mart is a […]

Delhi ITAT Deletes Penalty U/S 271C If Not Deducting TDS On Account of Belief U/S 194J

While discovering that the taxpayer has a valid reason to acknowledge the payments for ‘transactional charges’ to be not covered u/s 194J(1)(ba) of the Income Tax Act, the New Delhi ITAT ordered to deletion of the penalty order passed by the CIT(A) u/s 271C. Under Section 194J(1)(ba) of the Income Tax Act, any payment made […]

Mumbai ITAT: If No Advance Tax Query in Reassessment Proceedings Then IT Section 249(4)(b) Can’t Apply

Section 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not apply when there is no question of advance tax payment in the income tax reassessment proceedings, the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held. The taxpayer M/s. Nine Globe Industries Pvt. Ltd. furnished its income return dated 29.09.2012 for AY 2012-13 declaring […]

Kolkata ITAT: Claim of Cash Deposits Can’t Be Denied Based on Assumed Spending

The matter of Sunil Khaitan vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) is concerned with the taxation of cash deposits incurred at the time of the demonetization period. Sunil Khaitan, the appellant, filed his ITR for the AY 2017-18, reporting a total income of Rs. 40,48,000/-. However, his case was appointed for scrutiny under the Computer Aided Scrutiny […]